D = DO
N = NOT
C = COUNT
Get ready boys and girls for your new DNC math test. If you live in MI or FL and voted for President in our primary - well, that won't count.
However, if you live OUTSIDE the U.S. and vote in our primary - well that DOES count, even though it doesn't count in a general election.
If you live in Texas and voted in our primary, that will count 70%. In order to get the other 30% you have to vote again, only this vote actually counts more because more delegates are given.
If you voted in Washington state at the caucus you can add up all the delegates that will count. But even though more of you voted in the primary, well, no delegates were awarded there.
If you vote in a "red state" that held a caucus, like Alaska, your delegate vote counts three times as much as those that voted in California in a primary election. Their delegate votes count the least.
So when you add it all up - what do you have?
Who knows - as long as Barack Obama is the winner, then the DNC math works.
This has gotta be one of the most bitter replies that I have read.
Why won't you respect the RULES? You know, the ones that previous candidates had to follow when they ran for the Democratic Party's Presidential nomination?
Why should Clinton get the benefit of an ever changing target? She knew and supported the DNC decision that MI and FL wouldn't count. Check out the facts, they are well documented.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ULxxBz-PA jg
Texas has a 2 step contest. This was known to all candidates BEFORE the contest began. So were the RULES in Washington State, as were those in Alaska and California.
The RULES didn't change while the contest was underway. No, not at all. But that is what your candidate feels that she is entitled to. And here you are buying into her perverse logic that the RULES should be interpreted as she requires to win a contest that she has lost.
How is this unfair to the poor little girl who learned how to shoot in Scranton?
