Display:


Re: Well, MS Wolf ..... (none / 0)

The reason I suspect you're a troll is, actually, because of this line:

...the first step in that is to regain Hillary's rightful place among the blogosphere as a good and loyal Democrat who has done great things for America.

If folks won't accept that, then they are not willing to heal the divide and work together to defeat McCain.

It's conditional crap like this that I think is useless and does nothing but treat people who differ  from your point of view as though they're idiots.


I'm only a click away
by juliewolf on Thu Jun 05, 2008 at 04:39:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Well, MS Wolf ..... (none / 0)

You know, that's my opinion, and I am entitled to it.

Frankly,my dear, I don't give a damn about your 'suspicions', because I know my motives and my record of support for Democratic candidates.  Your 'opinion' of me or your 'suspicions' are about as relevant to me as the toilet problems on the space shuttle were before they were fixed.

Now, 18 million .... COUNT  THEM, 18 MILLION voters were for Hillary.  Ignore their feelings if you think that's wise.  Frankly I think that those who are not willing to relent and  restore Hillary to her rightfully respected status in the party  are much more of a problem for 'unity' than folks like me who are labeled a 'troll' because you don't like my message.


Hell's bells, even the GOP didn't have to crucify Eisenhower's record in order to make Reagan their 'saint'. We can have two great ones, you know?
by emsprater on Thu Jun 05, 2008 at 05:23:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Well, MS Wolf ..... (none / 0)

Now, 18 million .... COUNT THEM, 18 MILLION voters were for Hillary.
Sort of. 18 Million had a preference of Clinton over Obama, but my guess is that only a very small number of those prefer McCain to Obama and that most of them view Obama and Clinton as both very good candidates with a belief that one's more electable than the other. I don't think your message is meaningful. I don't think Clinton needs to vindicate herself or to prove anything to anyone. She ran a strong campaign that, ultimately, was unsuccessful. That's fine. If you, however, treat Clinton's image in the blogosphere as a top priority at this point, I don't think you've got anything particularly interesting or relevant to contribute.
I'm only a click away
by juliewolf on Thu Jun 05, 2008 at 06:03:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Well, MS Wolf ..... (none / 0)

18 million voters  (mostly Democrats at that) supported Hillary over Obama,  He won with a larger count by a slim margin given him by independents.

No where did I say that Hillary's voters would choose McCain.  Most will not.  Some may choose to leave the spot blank, that is their right to do so.  No, Hillary has nothing to prove at this point.  However, her supporters deserve more than having our noses rubbed in every pile of manure some of the blogosphere folks can find or invent.  Ignore that if you think it's helpful

Well, since you think I don't have anything interesting or relevant to contribute, please by all means, accept my cordial invitation to eternally skip my commentary and keep your oh so wise and learned opinions to yourself.


Hell's bells, even the GOP didn't have to crucify Eisenhower's record in order to make Reagan their 'saint'. We can have two great ones, you know?
by emsprater on Thu Jun 05, 2008 at 09:12:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]