Display:


I guess you do not follow Illinois politics (2.00 / 1)

The majority of Illinois Democratic delegation voted against the war. Here is the list that voted against the war:

Sen Dick Durbin- Rep Jerry Costello- Rep Danny Davis- Rep Lane Evans- Rep Luis Gutierrez Rep Jesse Jackson, Jr- Rep Bill Lipinski- Sen Bobby Rush- Rep Jan Schakowsky

Only 3 members of Illinois Democratic delegation voted for the Iraq war resolution. Sen. Obama was getting ready to run for the US Senate and it was politically very important for him to get the support of majority of the delegation.

I am not trying to find fault with Sen. Obama.He is no idealist. He is a skilled politician and makes the right moves. We want a winning candidate against McCain not another loser.


You may not agree with What I say but don't forget I am a Democrat
by indydem99 on Fri Jul 04, 2008 at 05:53:31 AM EST
[ Parent ]

I actually do follow Illinois Politics (none / 0)

and if not for a wife-beating scandal, Illinois' junior Senator would be Senator Blair Hull, Hillary Clinton would've been the Democratic nominee for President in February, and Barack Obama would be a name only known in Chicago.


The American people; they were for the war before they were against it.
by nrafter530 on Fri Jul 04, 2008 at 12:34:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I guess you do not follow Illinois politics (2.00 / 2)

You can say that, but the fact remains that, in his speech against the war in 2003, he described to an exact T exactly why the war would be a disaster.  John McCain doesn't even know the difference between a Sunni and a Shia.  At the time of that Senate election, vast majorities in the country supported the war.  I think all elected officials who took a stand against it should be respected for that.  Even if you are right, I'd take any politician who voted against war for political expediency over a politician who voted FOR war for political expediency.


Montesquieu and Locke are rolling in their graves right now...
by mannabass on Fri Jul 04, 2008 at 12:56:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Nice point (none / 0)

Even if you are right, I'd take any politician who voted against war for political expediency over a politician who voted FOR war for political expediency.

Assuming, of course, that the politician who voted against war has other qualities to recommend him/her-- like being good at the job.


by Swedie on Fri Jul 04, 2008 at 02:35:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Nice point (2.00 / 1)

Being against the war for the right reasons is a good start.


Montesquieu and Locke are rolling in their graves right now...
by mannabass on Sat Jul 05, 2008 at 12:55:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]