Woah there, internet detective, you better not try and figure out who it was that attacked you, or it would actually be a warning shot across the bow to opponents of CanadianGal that they will be tracked down and exposed for speaking ill of the Canadiamessiah.
have just proved what your intention is here in that comment. well done!
My intention is to point out:
1. There is nothing wrong with figuring out who is attacking you, or someone you support. Being anonymous is no excuse to let someone get away with slander.
2. It is offensive to make accusations without evidence.
You see tracking down the sources of the Muslim smears as scary and offensive.
Yet, whoever attacked your blog needs to face a public call-out and your internet detectivery.
You don't see yourself saying it COULD be Obama supporters as accusing Obama supporters.
Yet, when I suggest you COULD have done it yourself you see it as a direct accusation on you.
I am saying this to illustrate points one and two above.
Go ahead and do your best to find out who made the false reports, and post IF you have evidence. But when you do, remember that is in conflict with your theory that uncovering anonymous posters is wrong.
i have heard your 'problems' with this diary a couple of times now. clearly your intention is to suggest all sorts of things that are untrue. and i no longer am interested in engaging you.
thanks for your feedback. and happy 4th of july.
