I find it more believable that 'PUMA and it's ilk' would be responsible for shutting down 'Clintonistas for Obama'.
They are the ones that feel you are betraying 'the cause'. Makes more sense that those opposing Obama would be intent on shutting down sites that support him. And, as a whole, PUMAz have made it clear that they are not too keen on 'Clintonistas' who support Obama (see linfar and anyone else on Hillary's Voice, and several other Clinton support sites, who have voiced support for Obama). Just my take.
As it is, both your assumption and mine are equally unprovable....though, mine, in this instance, is more logical.
i kinda decided not to respond to anymore of the comments since there is a lot of trollish behaviour - but decided to make an exception for you.
i am not accusing anyone specifically - and it could have been a wide variety of groups doing this. but im pretty certain it was a human created problem rather than bots.
Thanks for the reply CG....I commented in good faith and there is/was no intention to be divisive. ;)
My point was (and is) that sans proof....any speculating as to who may be responsible is just that...speculation.
Though, I still believe that there is more logic in assuming those with anger towards Clinton supporters who now support Obama would be the more likely culprit (as opposed to Obama supporters who are stoked and proud to have Clintonistas supporting Obama).
Have a Happy 4th (though, in Canada...I reckon it is just another Friday). ;)
yep. canada day was on tuesday. happy 4th to you too!
